I bought a painting (yay!)

2016 is off to a great start. While in the Hawke’s Bay for new year, I was fortunate to meet Fane Flaws, take a tour of his astonishing home, and buy one of his recent works – Electric Id #1 (gouache on brown paper).

These Psychedelic Ids are just mesmerising. Can’t wait to get it home.

 

electric_id_1_framed

DP2016

And we’re off! Good luck, gentlemen…

Johnny (0)

  1. Christina Applegate
  2. Sharon Osborne
  3. Kathy Bates
  4. Robert De Niro
  5. Melissa Etheridge
  6. Suzanne Somers
  7. Mr T
  8. Rod Stewart
  9. Carly Simon
  10. Ringo Starr

Granma Pip (0)

  1. Billy Connelly
  2. William Windsor
  3. Bill Cosby
  4. William  Shatner
  5. Bill Gates
  6. Billy Joel
  7. Billy Ray Cyrus
  8. Venus Williams
  9. Willy Nelson
  10. Billy Jean King

Dave (6)

  1. Sean Connery
  2. Roger Moore
  3. George Lazenby
  4. Abe Vigoda
  5. Kirk Douglas
  6. Mary Tyler Moore
  7. Prince Philip
  8. Clive James
  9. Stephen Hawking
  10. Tommy Chong

Nick (0)

  1. Lindsay Lohan
  2. Martin Crowe
  3. Prince Phillip
  4. Mohammed Ali
  5. Paul Gasgoine
  6. Joost van der Westhuizen
  7. Stephen Hawking
  8. Justin Beiber
  9. Jay-Z
  10. Michael Schumacher

Sian (0)

  1. Barry Humphries
  2. Lady Gaga (Stefani Germanztta)
  3. Richard O’Brien
  4. Dennis Rodman
  5. Caitlyn Jenner
  6. Eddy Izzard
  7. Hilary Swank
  8. James Franco
  9. Guy Pearce
  10. Craig McLachlan

Moi (0)

Rangergeddon

  1. Harry Windsor
  2. Axel Rose
  3. Geri Halliwell
  4. Danny Boniduce
  5. Ginger Baker
  6. Scott Dixon
  7. Susan Sarandon
  8. Tom Wolfe
  9. Robert Redford
  10. Woodie Allen

Michelle (0)

  1. Donald Trump
  2. Angelina Jolie
  3. Elton John
  4. Barack Obama
  5. Charlie Sheen
  6. Bret Michaels
  7. Mick Jagger
  8. Oprah Winfrey
  9. Lindsay Lohan
  10. Mel Gibson

Noddy & Trevor (0)

  1. Chuck Berry
  2. Georgina Beyer
  3. Prince Philip
  4. Dougal Stevenson
  5. Bashar Assad
  6. David McPhail
  7. Pope Benedict
  8. George Bush SNR
  9. Patricia Routledge
  10. Bob Hawke

Gordon (0)

  1. Donald Trump
  2. Kirk Douglas
  3. Hugh Hefner
  4. Bill Cosby
  5. The queen
  6. Sean Connery
  7. Billy Connoly
  8. Ozzy Osbourne
  9. Tom Waits
  10. Prince Phillip

Skull #24

This week I took delivery of my second Fane Flaws piece, this one a collaboration with his wife, Jo Blogg. Just love it.

striped_skull_24

The problem with digital social connections

 

I was interested to see this piece on TechCrunch this morning.

Wiith is described as something akin to Tinder, but with a focus on shared social experiences. Clearly the term ‘shared social experiences’ is open to broad interpretation, and I have no doubt that Wiith will be useful to the same fine people that managed to force Adult Friend Finder to pivot from its initial bearing as a social network for golfers. Deviants aside, Wiith is an interesting prospect and a reflection of a similar idea I had a year or so ago.

Two things really bug me about mainstream social platforms…

The first is selection bias. No matter whether you’re talking about Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Tinder or Grindr, new connection recommendations are typically based on shared attributes. Facebook wants me to meet Jill because we have 12 friends in common; LinkedIn wants me to meet Bob because we work in the same industry; and Tinder wants me to meet the Harris twins because – well, that ain’t gonna happen ‘cos I’m a happily married man. My point is, while digital social platforms have made it easier to meet new people, the selection of new connections based on the requirement of shared attributes is tantamount to inbreeding, and I don’t believe that’s a good thing.

Despite 500+ connections, my LinkedIn gene pool is so shallow you could dive in and smack your head on the bottom. My Facebook and Twitter profiles are no better – packed to the gunwales with colleagues and contemporaries. This is great for recruiters and those looking for a little industry chit chat, but useless in all other contexts. Back in my bar fly days I used to meet interesting, random people all the time – builders, bailiffs and bartenders (lots of bartenders), famous actors, authors, musicians and photographers, former mercenaries, convicted murderers… Thanks to the social networks’ recommendation algorithms, the opportunities for such wild and exhilarating encounters are now practically non-existent.

The other problem lies in the inherent agenda of social connections. While Facebook is less of an issue in this regard, connection requests are invariably tied up with an agenda of some kind. That LinkedIn request is from a headhunter or would-be supplier; the new Twitter follower is a content marketer wanting to leverage my reach and influence; and that Tinder request (ok bad example – Like I said, I’m a married man and don’t use Tinder).

I’ve come to realise that while our species is now more connected than it has ever been, we’ve also never been so lonely. Our social networks are designed to surround us with people just like ourselves, who invariably want something from us. The opportunity to meet new and interesting people for no other reason than to enjoy human interaction just doesn’t exist in today’s social networks, but it should.

Is Wiith the answer? Will it solve these ills and lead our species to the richness and fulfilment of genuine human interaction? Who knows. Maybe not, but it’s a nice idea and hopefully a sign of more to follow.

DP2015: Call for Entries

Ah, sweet December, my favourite time of year. The endless frustration of insane deadlines and absentee clients, offset by rampant binge spree drinking and a plethora of barbecued pork products. All of this, of course, pales in comparison to the true joy of this festive season – picking 10 celebs and praying to Glub / Uncle Chuck that they meet their mortal end before the next year is out.

That’s right, sports fans, DP2015 is open!

Stoked

Bought my first piece of NZ art – Why The Long Face #2, by Fane Flaws

why_the_longface_2

I well remember the iconic Radio With Pictures opening credits Fane Flaws created in the 80’s, and have long admired several of his other pieces in a friend’s office. The man is a living legend, and I was shocked to realise an original piece of his work was within my budget.

So stoked.

Got Schwag?

For about a year now Since the start of last year (time flies!) I’ve subscribed to Startup Threads Monthly. Every month a tshirt, some stickers and a discount offer from some hot new startup arrives in my mailbox, and a small fee appears on my credit card statement among the endless array of taxis, bar tabs and mobile phone charges.

Startup Threads

It’s been a while, and my initial motives for subscribing are no longer clear (probably some misguided, hipsterish desire to rock the startups nobody’s yet heard of – bogus and sad, I know). I know why I haven’t cancelled though, and for the same reasons I’d urge all of you to do one thing right now:

Sign up to a subscription service. Startup tshirts, underwear, razor blades, chocolate – whatever floats your boat.

Why? For me there are two reasons. First, there’s the absence of choice. Too many brands are labouring under the misapprehension that consumers want choice. Sure we do, generally speaking, but choice also creates problems we have to solve, and this will often cause us to simply not choose instead. I have to make a bajillion decisions every day at work, many of these having considerable consequences. You think I want to labour over more decisions in my free time? Hell no. Check out any busy working man’s sock and shirt drawer some time and you’ll see I’m not alone – all those threadbare shirts and odd socks are testament to the fact that choice can be an inhibitor to action.

By subscribing to Startup Threads I get a new shirt every month. Some are awesome (better than anything I could have found through hours of shopping), some are pretty cool, and a few I really dislike – but that’s ok with me because the juice is worth the squeeze. To me the cost of a dud once in a while is way less than the benefit of getting a new shirt every month, mostly cool, without having to think about it.

The second reason I love subscription services is possibly a little childish but still valid. I love surprises, and it’s nice to get one every now and then even if I did pay for it myself. Nothing beats arriving home after a long hard day and seeing a mystery package on the table. Joy! Sure I know it’s going to be a shirt, but what’s the design, who’s the startup, will the colour be awesome or… *not awesome*? It’s like having your own little Christmas morning each month, but without the ham (dammit – hey Frank, any chance you could throw in some ham?).

I’ll admit that when some of these product subscription services started to emerge I was more than a little skeptical. Why would someone pay top dollar for something they don’t even get to choose? If you only consider the simple exchange of money for product then yes, it all seems a little nonsensical. But once you factor in the cost of choosing vs the value of not having to choose, and the value of finding a surprise in the mailbox each month, the balance tips entirely the other way. Behavioural economics is some interesting shit, huh?

Go on. Treat yourself.